Over a year ago, 22 year-old Motari was filmed by his fellow marines holding a puppy by the back of its neck (much like a female dog holds her puppies in her mouth), and tossing it off a cliff in the middle of an Iraqi desert. Many months later, they put the video on YouTube and were sure to include his name in the title. Perhaps Motari ticked someone off he shouldn’t have, I don’t know. Anyway, the video has had hundreds of thousands of views, and although it’s been deleted, groups such as the American Resistance Movement (a bunch of nuts who worship Ron Paul as deity) have reposted it with their silly logo’s and website addresses at the beginning.

            Motari’s puppy-murder is horrible indeed. Even though he said somewhere he was doing the puppy a “favor” by throwing it off of a cliff in the middle of sand-land because no one could take care of it, he tried to make a joke out of it, which is sadistic. Nonetheless, the reaction from liberal Europeans and North American’s all over the Internet has not only been laughable and completely hypocritical, but hateful, cruel, and extremely asinine.

            One Canadian YouTube poster named chrisdamage83, who claims to be 25, wrote regarding the Motari “What is wrong with you who throws a pupy [sic] off a cliff man you are really screwed up man you should go crawl up and die somwere [sic] you sick pig you stupid American.” I’m sure I missed a few [Sic]’s, but it was getting tedious to look at that “sentence.” He also thinks he is talking directly to David Motari, as if Motari just sits all day long on his laptop in Iraq or wherever he is stationed at the moment reading hate comments directed towards him on YouTube.

            A Netherlander who goes by the moniker DOLLARCRASH1984 wrote “BAGHDAD — A suicide bomber killed five American soldiers on a foot patrol Monday after detonating his explosives vest in central Baghdad, the U.S. military said, the deadliest attack on U.S. forces in Iraq in more than a month. That 5 that won't be taunting poor Iraqi kids or throwing puppies anymore.” Those marines won’t be giving poor Iraqi children free candy, throwing them tennis balls, or seeing their own wife and kids again either.  I guess we can’t expect every person (he has video-montages of American’s being murdered by IED’s in Iraq on his YouTube channel http://www.youtube.com/user/DOLLARCRASH1984) from a country who sells drugs out of coffee shops like they’re biscotti to be very clear thinking though. I mean, he watches videos of American’s being murdered for his own enjoyment, but heaven forbid one American out of 300 million kill a puppy or taunt a child. I’m sure kids in the Netherlands have and will torture cats, step on snakes, pick the wings off of butterflies and more. He also wrote in one comment that “people in America are moral [sic] (F-bomb deleted) up.”

            It’s not just non-Americans. A 19 year old American with the YouTube screen name thuggishdeer, shared this tidbit of wisdom: “the next president might be john meccain who will follow in bush's plans to keep sending soldiers over to iraq to do nothing. because nobody will vote a woman or a black man as president. all white people wont vote for obama thats 60% of the votes.” I’m just not touching that with the [sic]’s. I also don’t think his claims even need to be refuted. 80% of Americans are white, and Obama’s primary racial constituency is white people. You see the hatred and ignorance of the young American liberal on display nonetheless.

            This is just a mere sample of the comments liberals from the United States to Germany have been saying concerning Puppygate. If you look at the Dutch boy’s favorite videos on his YouTube channel, the link of which I have provided above, you’ll see that thousands of liberals aren’t condemning the videos of roadside bombings by terrorists. But, thousands of liberals are flocking to a video of an American Marine killing a puppy to say virulent things about American’s and write diatribes with CAPSLOCK ON, BEGGING FOR Motari to be hung, skinned, raped, scolded with boiling water, mutilated, and killed. Many have also said they wish he goes to hell, or wish that “heaven and hell existed” so that Motari can go to hell for killing a puppy. It should be noted that most liberals are pro-abortion.

            The Motari-incident and the ensuing liberal reaction leaves me dumbfounded as to why liberals join the Townhall discussion boards and call conservatives hateful, stupid, and close-minded. I’ve never seen conservatives say things like the stuff liberals are saying (mostly incoherently) all over the Internet about Private Puppy Throw. Liberals often pride themselves on being rational and caring, but are they really? A whole lot of them aren’t. I also noticed that many of the people writing the hate-comments and articles are young liberals. You know, the ones commonly infected by “Obamamania.” Hatred, intolerance, racism (a lot of the liberal posters in the Motari video comments are anti-Israeli and are more like Nazi’s than the ones they spew the term at), and bigotry are alive and well. They are symptoms which permeate the mind of liberals all over the world who claim to be against such things, but in actuality embrace them.

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about Creation and evolution, atheists and religious people (specifically Christians and Jews lately. Atheists are getting much more aggressive in their attempts to proselytize, and we religious people have to fight against atheists arguments. Atheists love to center their arguments around dating methods, evolution, how the Bible is so “fantastical” like a fairy tale that it must not be true since fairy tales and the like aren’t true, and pagan gods, such as what the Greeks and Roman’s used to worship, which were pretty much proven false by time. Let me make a point before I go on: Greek’s and Roman’s (Italians) converted to Christianity, not atheism, and that’s how they became enlightened to see that their old “gods” were nothing more than idols, perhaps demons.  The threat atheists pose these days are great, even though Christians, Jews, and Muslim’s, and those of other religions often regard them as nothing more than hopeless pessimists. Atheists, such as the dead leaders of Soviet Russia, Mao’s China, Pol Pot’s Cambodia, Hitler’s Germany, and more have caused bloodshed greater than any religious war has bought upon humanity, and some modern atheists are walking in these former atheists footsteps. They want to brainwash your children, impose their rule, and even say what you can and cannot think about or believe, as is evident in the words Atheists have said, which can be seen in Dinesh D’Souza’s column “The Atheist Indoctrination Project” http://www.townhall.com/columnists/DineshDSouza/2007/10/22/the_atheist_indoctrination_project.

It completely baffles me that atheists regard religious folk as what they (atheists) are: Humans with a highly dangerous belief system.

Atheism is not based on reason (one of its key components is a faulty THEORY!), and atheists preach their message supposedly to make the world a better place. I guess atheists think humanity must perfect itself so we can make ourselves live forever in comfort, because if they only have one life to live, I don’t know why some waste it trying to take other’s hope away. Communism was one step atheist thinkers came up with in order to “perfect” humanity, and look what it did. If someone truly is atheist, their life has no true meaning, and neither does anyone else’s, so why worry about what anyone else believes at all? If you’re an atheist, you believe you’ll die and nothing will happen, and that the same will happen to everyone else, so why does an atheist care so much about others human’s length of life? Is it something atheists worry about (and I don’t believe it’s something many atheists worry about at all, Stalin certainly did not) to occupy their time on earth as they await their eternal death, of nothingness?

                I intend on writing a few articles that deal with atheism. I am not a scientist, I am not a theologian, and I’m no expert in either field in any way, but I am a human and I must believe in something and I want facts to defend my position, so I have studied arguments for and against atheism, Christianity and Judaism, and some other religions. What I write is opinion, and you’re more than welcome to share what you think, point out flaws in my argument, or agree with me if you wish. I’d like to start off discussing evolution and Creation in a fairly simple way.

                First of all, I don’t believe in macro evolution. I believe God made fish, lizards, monkeys, hamsters and humans all separately. There is no doubt certain animals have close characteristics to humans. Gorilla’s can learn by observation, most animals cry and/or feel sad when treated poorly, many animals like cats, dolphins, dogs, some monkeys, and more are friendly and almost social in a way. Even ants store food and hold a hierarchy of command of some sort as humans do in a more complex manner, and for the record I know ants aren’t an animal. I believe in micro evolution. For example, birds evolve certain beaks depending on the feeding habits of their forefathers, moths evolve different color wings to camouflage themselves with their local scenery and conditions, and different species of sharks may be more or less evolved versions of sharks. I also believe in Creation, that humanity is only 8-10 thousand years old, although the earth itself is older. In the book of Genesis, chapter 1, it says:

1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. (NIV)

    Now, I am definitely no theologian, let alone an authority on the Bible, but this is what I understand: There was no time yet in regards to these two verses, because verses 3, 4, and 5 say:

3 And God said, "Let there be light," and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light "day," and the darkness he called "night." And there was evening, and there was morning--the first day. (Italics added) (NIV)

                So the earth being millions, or billions of years old does not conflict with the Bible, and indeed God may have made the earth “old” so that it was more stable. Imagine if every rock was brand new at one moment. Imagine if every tree was a seed. It wouldn’t really work I don’t think, so I think God may have made things that date back millions of years, and trees and things that were already grown (just as God made Adam a man and not a baby to start off). The rocks which date back millions of years which we have, perhaps developed from sand into rock while the earth was still formless, and without light, but I don’t know.

The point is, the Biblical account of Creation does not contradict with science, there are many ways it can clearly fit into place without compromise, in fact, if anything, science actually seems to support Biblical Creation, because it just so happens that the Bible does not contradict real science at all. Evolution as we have it today is still merely a theory, a hypothesis many would say. It is important to remember that modern science, specifically carbon dating, cannot date anything older than thousands of years old. Some other dating methods time periods are simply made up off the top of scientist’s heads in order to fit into their evolutionary theory, as you can read about at http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/carbon_dating.asp under “ ‘Bad’ Dates,” you can also read all about carbon dating there, that is where I got my information on the subject. Can you believe that? Evolutionists making up the time periods dating methods should express, in order for their dating methods to “fit” with evolution, when evolution is one of the things some of them are trying to support with the dates given by those dating methods!

Evolutionists believe in an impossible to test hypothesis to explain how their theory (evolution) came to be. We all have heard of it, it’s called the ”Big Bang Theory.” Inevitably atheists, specifically evolutionists (which seriously, just about every atheist is), must explain where that remarkable process of tiny organisms changing into humans started. When they do, ask them, what created the explosion? What created those gases? Nowadays, some atheists say there’s some kind of strange, unexplainable energy that made the gases. Well, what made this energy? They can believe in a magical energy but not a God. They have faith that a mystical energy force thingamajig created some kind of gases at random which exploded and created the earth, universe, and LIFE itself! I always found bringing this up destroys evolutionist arguments, so this is one tool you can use to combat evolution, and atheists ideas, especially if you’re new to the whole Creation V.S evolution argument and are yet to study it further. Don’t rely on this as a crutch too much in order to excuse yourself from learning more about scientific and theological matters in order to prepare better arguments for this position.

I know this article is long, so I’ll end it with this paragraph. Like I said, I intend to make a series of articles like this to help combat atheism, before it’s too late, just like it was for so many millions of Europeans and Asians and South American’s who died because of the socialist/communist ideas atheists like Fidel Castro, Che Guevara, Ho Chi Minh, and Vladimir Lenin propagated and enforced upon their people. It’s important to recognize socialist plans, such as the one Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton proposes for our healthcare system, which derive from an atheist ideology that has never worked. Finally, the majority of atheists are NOT bad people who want to kill us all! Most are people indoctrinated by a left-wing belief system in their schools, universities and the mainstream media, and people who haven’t really been exposed to good arguments against atheism. The religious folk of America (especially Christian’s, we Christian’s have been told by Jesus Himself in the Bible to spread the Word) have a duty, a duty which is so important it would almost be criminal in a way to neglect, to stop turning to atheism and evolution as sources of neutrality amongst our many religions, and do away with atheism before horrendous things happen to us humans because of atheism again.

~ Land of Confusion

Note: All Bible versus taken from the New International Version in a search on www.Crosswalk.com